Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 4 de 4
Filter
1.
European heart journal supplements : journal of the European Society of Cardiology ; 23(Suppl G), 2021.
Article in English | EuropePMC | ID: covidwho-1601920

ABSTRACT

Aims The SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has led to the development of the mRNA vaccines in humans which are well tolerated, safe, and highly efficacious;however, post-marketing surveillance is revealing potential rare cardiac adverse effects as acute pericarditis. We herein report two cases of symptomatic constrictive pericarditis following administration of the second dose of mRNA-1273 (Moderna) SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Methods and results Case summary: A 75 years old male with history of hypertension and COPD presented to our Hospital approximately one month after the second dose of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine with dyspnoea and leg oedema. Routine analysis resulted normal, no increasing of inflammatory markers or ECG abnormalities. Echocardiogram showed circumferential fibrinous pericardial effusion without tamponade and typical features of constrictive pericarditis: annulus reversus, ventricular interdependence, expiratory diastolic flow reversal in hepatic vein, inferior vena cava plethora. Pleural ultrasound showed bilateral pleural effusion that was sampled and showed a transudate fluid. Tumoral marker and a CT Scan, autoimmunity panel, blood tests for bacteraemia and Quantiferon were negative. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging confirmed thickening of pericardium. A 68 years old male with history of ischaemic heart disease with previous CABG, hypertension, dyslipidaemia and chronic kidney disease presented with palpitations and mild legs swelling. Approximately, 2 months before he received the second dose of mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine. Routine blood examinations resulted normal, ECG showed a right bundle branch block. Echocardiogram showed a mild enlargement of LV with normal systolic function, a moderate primary mitral regurgitation and a circumferential pericardial effusion, showing signs of constrictive syndrome. CT Scan demonstrated pericardium thickness. Constrictive pericarditis may represent a subacute complication of an asymptomatic exudative acute pericarditis. Although cases of acute pericarditis have been reported after SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, to our knowledge, the association with constrictive pericarditis has not been described. The temporal link between vaccination and symptoms development as the biological plausibility of autoimmune or cross-reaction response to vaccination in predisposed subjects could suggest a possible correlation as an adverse event, even if causality could not be established. Conclusions We present two cases of constrictive pericarditis occurring after mRNA-1273 SARS-CoV-2 vaccination, aiming further data to confirm a causal role.

2.
J Card Surg ; 37(1): 165-173, 2022 Jan.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1488225

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE: To analyze Italian Cardiac Surgery experience during the pandemic of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) identifying risk factors for overall mortality according to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) status. METHODS: From February 20 to May 31, 2020, 1354 consecutive adult patients underwent cardiac surgery at 22 Italian Centers; 589 (43.5%), patients came from the red zone. Based on COVID-19 status, 1306 (96.5%) were negative to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-N), and 48 (3.5%) were positive to SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-P); among the COVID-P 11 (22.9%) and 37 (77.1%) become positive, before and after surgery, respectively. Surgical procedures were as follows: 396 (29.2%) isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), 714 (52.7%) isolated non-CABG procedures, 207 (15.3%) two associate procedures, and three or more procedures in 37 (2.7%). Heart failure was significantly predominant in group COVID-N (10.4% vs. 2.5%, p = .01). RESULTS: Overall in-hospital mortality was 1.6% (22 cases), being significantly higher in COVID-P group (10 cases, 20.8% vs. 12, 0.9%, p < .001). Multivariable analysis identified COVID-P condition as a predictor of in-hospital mortality together with emergency status. In the COVID-P subgroup, the multivariable analysis identified increasing age and low oxygen saturation at admission as risk factors for in-hospital mortality. CONCLUSION: As expected, SARS-CoV-2 infection, either before or soon after cardiac surgery significantly increases in-hospital mortality. Moreover, among COVID-19-positive patients, older age and poor oxygenation upon admission seem to be associated with worse outcomes.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , SARS-CoV-2 , Adult , Aged , Coronary Artery Bypass , Humans , Prognosis
3.
ASAIO J ; 67(4): 385-391, 2021 04 01.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1155817

ABSTRACT

An increased need of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) support is going to become evident as treatment of SARS-CoV-2 respiratory distress syndrome. This is the first report of the Italian Society for Cardiac Surgery (SICCH) on preliminary experience with COVID-19 patients receiving ECMO support. Data from 12 Italian hospitals participating in SICCH were retrospectively analyzed. Between March 1 and September 15, 2020, a veno-venous (VV) ECMO system was installed in 67 patients (94%) and a veno-arterio-venous ECMO in four (6%). Five patients required VA ECMO after initial weaning from VV ECMO. Thirty (42.2%) patients were weaned from ECMO, while 39 (54.9%) died on ECMO, and six (8.5%) died after ECMO removal. Overall hospital survival was 36.6% (n = 26). Main causes of death were multiple organ failure (n = 14, 31.1%) and sepsis (n = 11, 24.4%). On multivariable analysis, predictors of death while on ECMO support were older age (p = 0.048), elevated pre-ECMO C-reactive protein level (p = 0.048), higher positive end-expiratory pressure on ventilator (p = 0.036) and lower lung compliance (p = 0.032). If the conservative treatment is not effective, ECMO support might be considered as life-saving rescue therapy for COVID-19 refractory respiratory failure. However warm caution and thoughtful approaches for timely detection and treatment should be taken for such a delicate patients population.


Subject(s)
COVID-19/mortality , COVID-19/therapy , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/adverse effects , Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation/methods , Respiratory Distress Syndrome/therapy , Respiratory Insufficiency/etiology , Acute Kidney Injury/etiology , Adult , Aged , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Female , Humans , Intensive Care Units , Italy/epidemiology , Lung Diseases/etiology , Male , Middle Aged , Positive-Pressure Respiration , Pulmonary Embolism/etiology , Renal Replacement Therapy , Retrospective Studies , Sepsis/etiology , Stroke/etiology
4.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 59(4): 901-907, 2021 04 29.
Article in English | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1114845

ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES: Healthcare systems worldwide have been overburdened by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak. Accordingly, hospitals had to implement strategies to profoundly reshape both non-COVID-19 medical care and surgical activities. Knowledge about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cardiac surgery practice is pivotal. The goal of the present study was to describe the changes in cardiac surgery practices during the health emergency at the national level. METHODS: A 26-question web-enabled survey including all adult cardiac surgery units in Italy was conducted to assess how their clinical practice changed during the national lockdown. Data were compared to data from the corresponding period in 2019. RESULTS: All but 2 centres (94.9%) adopted specific protocols to screen patients and personnel. A significant reduction in the number of dedicated cardiac intensive care unit beds (-35.4%) and operating rooms (-29.2%), along with healthcare personnel reallocation to COVID departments (nurses -15.4%, anaesthesiologists -7.7%), was noted. Overall adult cardiac surgery volumes were dramatically reduced (1734 procedures vs 3447; P < 0.001), with a significant drop in elective procedures [580 (33.4%) vs 2420 (70.2%)]. CONCLUSIONS: This national survey found major changes in cardiac surgery practice as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. This experience should lead to the development of permanent systems-based plans to face possible future pandemics. These data may effectively help policy decision-making in prioritizing healthcare resource reallocation during the ongoing pandemic and once the healthcare emergency is over.


Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Cardiac Surgical Procedures , Communicable Disease Control , Humans , Italy , Pandemics , SARS-CoV-2
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL